To understand what intersectionality is, and what it has become, you have to look at Crenshaw’s body of work over the past 30 years on race and civil rights. more interested in the deep structural and systemic questions about discrimination and inequality.” The origins of “intersectionality” Minofu described Crenshaw’s understanding of intersectionality as “not really concerned with shallow questions of identity and representation but. In Crenshaw’s civil rights law class, he said, “what she did in the course was really imbue a very deep understanding of American society, American legal culture, and American power systems.” I also spoke with Kevin Minofu, a former student of Crenshaw’s who is now a postdoctoral research scholar at the African American Policy Forum, a think tank co-founded by Crenshaw in 1996 with a focus on eliminating structural inequality. Mari Matsuda, a law professor at the University of Hawaii who has worked with Crenshaw on issues relating to race and racism for years, told me, “She is not one to back away from making people uncomfortable.” “This is what happens when an idea travels beyond the context and the content,” she said.īut those who have worked with her have seen how she can ask tough questions and demand hard answers, particularly on the subject of race, even of her closest allies. The current debate over intersectionality is really three debates: one based on what academics like Crenshaw actually mean by the term, one based on how activists seeking to eliminate disparities between groups have interpreted the term, and a third on how some conservatives are responding to its use by those activists.Ĭrenshaw has watched all this with no small measure of surprise. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) tweets that “the future is female intersectional.” The Daily Wire’s Ben Shapiro, meanwhile, posts videos with headlines like “Is intersectionality the biggest problem in America?” Intersectionality has become a dividing line between the left and the right. Nolwen Cifuentes for Voxīut it’s not just academic panels where the fight over what intersectionality is - or isn’t - plays out. ![]() Professor Kimberlé Crenshaw coined the term “intersectionality” in a 1989 academic paper. In her mildly overheated office, the professor was affable and friendly as she answered questions while law students entered her office intermittently as they prepared for a panel discussion coincidentally titled “ Mythbusting Intersectionality” scheduled for that evening. Crenshaw, who is a professor at both Columbia and the University of California Los Angeles, had just returned from an overseas trip to speak at the Sorbonne and the London School of Economics.Ĭrenshaw is a 60-year-old Ohio native who has spent more than 30 years studying civil rights, race, and racism. I met Kimberlé Crenshaw in her office at Columbia Law School on Manhattan’s Upper West Side on a rainy day in January. Through her work, she’s attempting to demolish racial hierarchies altogether. They object to its implications, uses, and, most importantly, its consequences, what some conservatives view as the upending of racial and cultural hierarchies to create a new one.īut Crenshaw isn’t seeking to build a racial hierarchy with black women at the top. The lived experiences - and experiences of discrimination - of a black woman will be different from those of a white woman, or a black man, for example. Indeed, they largely agree that it accurately describes the way people from different backgrounds encounter the world. In my conversations with right-wing critics of intersectionality, I’ve found that what upsets them isn’t the theory itself. “Intersectionality” has, in a sense, gone viral over the past half-decade, resulting in a backlash from the right. It was coined in 1989 by professor Kimberlé Crenshaw to describe how race, class, gender, and other individual characteristics “intersect” with one another and overlap. This is a highly unusual level of disdain for a word that until several years ago was a legal term in relative obscurity outside academic circles. It tells you what you’re allowed to say, what you’re allowed to think.” Intersectionality is thus “ really dangerous” or a “ conspiracy theory of victimization.” ![]() To many conservatives, intersectionality means “because you’re a minority, you get special standards, special treatment in the eyes of some.” It “ promotes solipsism at the personal level and division at the social level.” It represents a form of feminism that “puts a label on you. There may not be a word in American conservatism more hated right now than “intersectionality.” On the right, intersectionality is seen as “ the new caste system” placing nonwhite, non-heterosexual people on top.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |